About Me

Name: Howard Roark
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Tim Russert's passing has bad news and good news...

Tim Russert, the on air equivilent of a water-boarding session, has been taken from us too early.  The good news is that Tim has made it into heaven.  The bad news is that he has taken over St. Peter's job as the questioner at the Pearly Gates.  Who knows what the Angels will and can dig up on your life?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Green, the new Red!

 
I don't know what is more troubling.  The fact that Time magazine desecrates the memory of those who fought on Iwo Jima, or that they now think that Biased and Unbalanced is OK for them.  As Richard Stengel says in the article:
 
“I think since I’ve been back at the magazine, I have felt that one of the things that’s needed in journalism is that you have to have a point of view about things,” Stengel said. “You can’t always just say ‘on the one hand, on the other’ and you decide. People trust us to make decisions. We’re experts in what we do. So I thought, you know what, if we really feel strongly about something let's just say so.”
 
I doubt Congress is going to pass a new "Fairness Doctrine" to force Time to devote half their magazine to opposite view.  They use the public mail system to diseminate their proganda, right?
 
At least Stengel is coming out and saying what the MSM has been doing for years.  But are they really experts?  Not to be mean here folks, but aren't the kids you remember from college that were in journalism slightly lacking in the 'expert' category?  I thought that the main pull of majoring in journalism is that you didn't let hard studies get in the way of actually sitting around complaining.
 
As we come out of a really harsh winter, we see Global Warming turning into Climate Change as a way to explain away the lack of global warming since 1998.  At the same time, the predictions of gloom and doom increase as just more and more scientists start to question and downgrade the impacts.  The future doom and gloom has to increase since the desire to shift to a more socialist economy can be only sustained if there is some huge danger that can only be averted if we change from red, white and blue to just Red.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sen. Obama's Speech in Race Misdirects from the Real Problem

What an amazing speech, and I don't mean in a good way. I think that speech is one of the most finely crafted pieces of missinformantion and propaganda that has been deleivered in recent memory.  History will be the judge of whether Sen. Obama has saved his campaign from a black-eye.

F
irst off, Sen. Obama had a major win by framing the debate when he declared his speech was about race in America.  Instead of talking about a racist, America-hating “Holy” man and how he has affected Sen. Obama, we are in for a treat of rhetorical machinations.  For the more visually orientated people, I wonder why they stopped at just eight American flags behind him.

“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.”

Two hundred and twenty one years ago,…  …perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part – through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

I think it is interesting that reduces the Civil War to one part of the struggle for civil rights.  If slavery is our original sin, the Civil War was our baptism by blood.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign… …, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

Interesting that the ends his spectrum are dumb white liberals and a black racist America hater.  That’s a pretty narrow spectrum, since both ends think that America is to blame for most of the ills in the world. I’m having a really hard time placing myself on this spectrum.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

This last paragraph is truly a rhetorical gem.  First off, he talks about Rev. Wright in the same terms you could use to describe Dr. MLK Jr.  He describes the questions as nagging, as if they are too trivial to really address.  I think it is pretty plain that “US-KKK-A” and the other Rev. Wright comments go far beyond being “fierce critic”.  At the same time he likens these ugly comments to teachings we hear at our own churches.  It is absolutely disingenuous to compare the hateful Dr. Wright’s comments to some unpopular basic teachings of mainstream religions such as don’t eat pork, abstain from pre-marital sex, or even (potentially controversial in some churches) don’t engage in homosexual acts.  Most of the disagreements we have with our own churches are almost always based on rules that appeal to our better angels, not our basic hate.  Is Sen. Obama really saying that a Churches suggestion respecting life by not harvesting human embryos for genetic manipulation is the same as saying that the US government developed the AIDS virus?


But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

Is there a major black leader who doesn’t espouse such views?  From Jesse Jackson to Al Sharpton the black leaders of America have preyed upon their flocks by using the white Bogey man as the cause of all problems and blaming Jews above all others.

As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity;… …there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another
(it seems only if you are black); to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine (So did Lee Harvey Oswald); who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country (probably not any more), and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth – by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, … …the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street
(Jesse Jackson once did also), and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe (Maybe his Grandmother could have been a rapper or the mayor of Detroit).

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love
(and his wife has been proud of for the last 9 weeks).

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

Now this is truly sickening attempt to balance Rev. Wright with Ms. Ferraro.  To equate Ms. Ferraro who dared to question the influence of Sen. Obama’s race on his success with the vile comments of Rev. Wright is unjust.  As to the question that Ms. Ferraro raised, I can answer that question, with a scientific precision greater than that used to determine the impact of Global Warming.  Unlike Global Warming, we can actually run an experiment where we run two candidates with similar levels of national political experience, near carbon copies of policies, who are both good looking and very eloquent, and come from humble beginnings. The white version of Barak Obama is Sen. John Edwards.  We can see the Oprah effect on the difference between their electoral standings. Unfortunately, I think people are rightly going to be talking about Rev. Wrights comments long after Ms. Ferraro is back to doing whatever she does in between elections.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now…   …We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven’t fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today’s black and white students.

We can only hope that Sen. Obama is looking to address this problem through real school choice and to hold these schools really accountable to students they have failed.  If not, buy busing companies stock, because they might get busy again.

Legalized discrimination…

…This is where we are right now. It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy – particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.
Bad news Sen. Obama. A major reason, that you even pointed out earlier in the speech, is the liberal’s idea that electing you will forgive our original sin.  If you are saying that your election would be just the first payment for the nations original sin, people might not want to pay the indulgence, but rather continue to wear the politically correct hairshirt for perpetual penance.

But I have asserted a firm conviction…

…But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.
 
We'll there you go folks.  A shot at what we can expect for 4/8 years if Hillary or McCain can't stop Sen. Obama.  Beautiful rhetoric that contains misdirection and false comparisions, all to save his own behind, and blame everyone equally for his problems. I can't wait.
 
Howard Roark

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hope you can handle the Audacity

From the WSJ Ronald Kessler Opinion piece.
In a sermon delivered at Howard University, Barack Obama's longtime minister, friend and adviser blamed America for starting the AIDS virus, training professional killers, importing drugs and creating a racist society that would never elect a black candidate president.
Wouldn't it be ironic that the reason that this black candidate won't get elected is because of the very statements made by this 'minister'?
 
I wonder if people are going to start looking for new nuances in some of Barak's old statements, not mention those of Michelle.  If this minister has administered this kind of 'damn America' attitude to Michelle, her comments about not being proud of America until recently take on another light.  By the way, how self-centered do you have to be if the only way you are proud of your country is if something only happens directly to you.  I was proud because of the Miracle on Ice and I don't even skate.
 
As noted in Mr. Kessler's article, this church was Sen. Obama's first real involvement with organized religion.  How is Sen. Obama getting a pass on an in depth analysis of his religion when Gov. Romney had to apoligize for everything that the Mormon church has and hasn't done.  I was raised Catholic, so these one-off churches are inherently odd to me, so in the name of fairness I looked up Sen. Obama's church's website.  From there you can start to get a feel for it.
 
From the About Page: (emphasis theirs)

The Pastor as well as the membership of Trinity United Church of Christ is committed to a 10-point Vision:

  1. A congregation committed to ADORATION.
  2. A congregation preaching SALVATION.
  3. A congregation actively seeking RECONCILIATION.
  4. A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.
  5. A congregation committed to BIBLICAL EDUCATION.
  6. A congregation committed to CULTURAL EDUCATION.
  7. A congregation committed to the HISTORICAL EDUCATION OF AFRICAN PEOPLE IN DIASPORA.
  8. A congregation committed to LIBERATION.
  9. A congregation committed to RESTORATION.
  10. A congregation working towards ECONOMIC PARITY.
Salvation; good, Reconciliation; nice, Disporia; what(?), Liberation; starting to get the hair on the back of my neck up, Economic Parity; Bingo-there it is- and I guess were throwing out the render to Ceaser what is Ceaser's.  Come to think of it, the economic parity doesn't sound that bad.  My wife is an Ivy League educated physician specialist and she doesn't make what Michelle makes blowing up balloons.  Come to think of it, I don't know if the cardiologists in her hospital blowing up catheter balloons make as much as she does, especially per hour, though she may be a better bargain per balloon.
 
I think you can tell a lot about someone by what they read, so I checked out the Churches online bookstore.   Not your typical Bible in many sizes and covers.
 
Quitting America by Randall Robinson is described as:
Randall Robinson is quitting America, and this book charts his journey from the most powerful nation on earth to the tiny tropical island where his wife was born. His search for a more peaceful and hospitable place grew out of the disappointment and increasing sense of abandonment he felt in the land of his own birth-an America that has sapped the creative energies of his race and "transfigured humanity."
Or, The Debt also by Randall Robinson described on the churches website as:
In this powerful and controversial book, Randall Robinson makes a persuasive case for the resotration of the rich history that slavery and segregation severed. Drawing from research and personal experience, he shows that only by reclaiming their lost past and proud heritage can blacks lay the foundation for a viable future.
Interestingly, the church's website fails to point out a major focus of the book is reparations as noted in the Introduction:
...America and other interests that profited owe reparations to blacks following the holocaust of African slavery which has carried forward from slavery’s inception for 350-odd years to the end of U.S. government-embraced racial discrimination—an end that arrived, it would seem, only just yesterday.
That Economic Parity directive starts to take on a whole new meaning.  For some reason, I don't think that this is the 'Change' that Obamaniacs thought they were signing up for.  So where are we now with all of this?  Sen. Obama will continue to chuckle about his crazy uncle, without actually addressing and commenting on the church and the radical and racist positions.
 
The Audacity of Hope seems to be more likely Hope you don't find the Audacity.
 
-Howard
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So here we are...

I'm finally starting a blog, which must mean that they are so 15 minutes ago, really probably so 5 years ago, but hey I've been busy.  I'm a big fan of 'The Fountainhead' by Ayn Rand and loved the dialog that she wrote.  Unfortunately, I'm not as a good a writer as Ayn, but I'm tired of all the things that are going on in America and the world and I needed some place to vent; my wife can take only so much.

I do think that the personal self-reliance and even selfishness of Howard Roark in 'The Fountain Head' forms an ideal that would help many people in their own lives.  Instead of worrying about others actions and their own inability for action, people should focus on their own lives and how to better themselves, without relying on the state for help or blaming society for their problems.  This leads to the reason for the creation of my Blog and why I named is after 'The Fountainhead' main character.  I think that now, unlike any time since the 1930s, we face a new drive towards increased collectivism and decreased individual freedoms.  Whether on the left or the right there is a drive towards reducing individual rights in the name of curing society’s problems or ensuring security. We no longer face a linear system of freedom on one end and communism on the other.  We now face a '^' shaped model with individual freedom perched precariously in the middle, with the drop to collectivism on either side.  Not since the nationalism of the Nazi's and the communism of the Soviets' have we faced such an assault on the freedom on individualism. 

Now the right and left are not the Nazis and Communists of the past, but at the same time the innate interrelatedness of our society and the technological advances that allow everything to be observed and noted make these extremes all the more potentially suffocating.

Against the background of the assault on individual freedoms, I see a distinct change in the kind of conflicts and interactions of people, business, and countries.  Human struggles seem to have been a battle of peers.  Sure there were Davids against Goliaths, but on the whole there was a symmetry and desire for parity in conflicts.  If someone had dreadnoughts their opponents wanted more and better, but they still wanted dreadnoughts.  Even guerilla wars like Vietnam and Afghanistan were more proxy surrogate wars, then real mano-e-minnow conflicts.  It seems to be that force-on-force conflict is being replaced by conflicts based on ideologue and asymmetry.  As we learned on 9/11, and Israel learned recently Lebanon, we now face enemies that are not just rouges without the usual command and control structures, but rather a network type enemy more akin the leaderless structure of the internet.  Based on that peer-to-peer model and enabled by the interconnectedness of the internet, these new enemies assault the current order.  These new attacks stress and test the democratic democracies ability deal with them without overreacting or under reacting.

So here we are, facing new enemies and who knows what history will make of our efforts.  All I know is that I want to hand down a better world to my two children, and I don't have my father around anymore to engage in Jesuit trained mental jujutsu, and my wife tires my dissertations.  Plus thoughts are never as well thought out until they exposed to the stark truth of a blank page.

Howard

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »